Reading Notes
- Sterotype: rationality is about removing “hot”, emotional reasoning and replacing it with “cool”, calculated reasoning
- Makes people uncomfortable
- Emotional reasoning is a core part of humanity and people feel like they’re giving up a portion of their humanity by being asked to give up emotional reasoning
- The reality is that rationality focuses on the reasoning, rather than the kind of reasoning
- The core aim of rationality is making you better at acheiving your goals, rather than telling you what your goals should be
- A brain is a specialized device that takes in information from the outside world and changes its internal state in response
- But that’s not the only thing it does:
- Planning
- Prediction
- Consciousness
- The brain is far from a perfect information processing machine
- There is no homonculus sitting inside the brain - the brain is all there is
- Rationality is about making the brain better at building up an internal representation of the outside world
- Sometimes the brain updates its model of the world automatically, but sometimes it allows the mind to choose how the model gets updated
- This is deeply troubling
- Why should the part of the brain responsible for making decisions based upon the model of the world have any say at all in how the model is built?
- Sometimes it takes conscious effort to acknowledge evidence and update your world-model
- Rationality is about putting in that effort to make your mental model of the world have a closer correspondence to how the world is
- The brain is not the mind
- The mind is implemented by the brain
- The mind is part of the brain, but not the only part
- Changes in the focus of our awareness are the result of changes in the brain’s model of the world
- On the path to rationality, there are no beliefs, only probabilities
- Believing the hypothesis that has the balance of probability in its favor leaves you open to being proven “wrong” by chance
- Stop thinking in terms of what will/won’t happen, but instead think of what will probably happen
- Try to keep multiple probable outcomes in your mind simultaneously
- This is difficult, which is why we should practice it
- Replace qualitative intuition with quantitative intuition
Discussion Notes
Lightning Talks
Rohit - Colors and How We See Them
- Nate states that perceiving the sky as blue is one of the instances where the brain updates its model automatically, free of outside influences
- This is false - even the perception of something as fundamental as color is culturally influenced
- 3 examples
- Ancient Greeks - never used the word blue
- Homer describes people has having violet eyes
- “Wine-dark seas”
- Himba Tribe of Namibia
- Don’t have separate words for green and blue
- Both colors are described the same word
- Have trouble distinguishing between blue and green swatches - study by Roberson, Davidoff et. al.
- Davidoff’s daughter
- Professor Davidoff carefully avoids teaching his daughter that the sky is blue
- Points at sky and asks her what color it is
- Response: “white”
- The presence of categories enhances our ability to see distinctions between objects in different categories
- Categories are historically and culturally determined
- For color, the invention of these categories appears to correspond with the invention of dyes - “blue” is a relatively young category because blue dye is more difficult to make
- Himba, ancient Greeks and Davidoff’s daughter all have different categories for color than the Western mainstream, so in a sense they do see colors differently
- Same light hitting the retinas is interpreted differently by the brain
Eric - How Sailboats Work
- All sailing is an exercise in applied Newtonian mechanics
- Wind pushes against sail
- Sail pulls on boat
- Water pushes against boat in the opposite direction
- Sailboats are able to sail at an angle to the wind by exploiting Newton’s third law
- Mount sail on a pivot
- Rotate sail such that it’s perpendicular to the wind, but at an angle to the boat
- Wind pushes on sail
- Equal and opposite force from water pushing on boat
- Boat moves relative to water at a different speed and direction that it moves relative to the wind
- This is fine - you don’t care about crossing a wind, but you do care about crossing the ocean
- The role of the keel in a boat is to keep the boat from sliding sideways through the water
- Triangular sails are especially handy, since they are easier to rotate - easier to match changes in the wind, easier to reposition for changes in desired course
Ben - Brainstorming
- To effectively brainstorm, set two timers
- Write down ideas and explore problem space in first timers
- Think of solutions and prune ideas in second timer
- Helps prevent you from getting fixated on a particular idea or solution
Reading Discussion
Desire Is The Direction, Rationality Is The Magnitude
- Rationality is a means, not an end
- Yudkowsky’s definition of rationality, which Soares is using, doesn’t disentangle intelligence and rationality
- Is intelligence a multiplier for rationality?
What Sort of Thing a Brain Is
- Purpose of this essay to show why we need rationality
- Brain isn’t a special, different thing
- Part of the body and subject to many of the same flaws of biology and evolution
- Human brains are weird, compared to animal brains
- Can hold a much broader set of relatively arbitrary information
- Allows for memes to move around between brains - semi-separate memetic ecosystem
Ephemeral Correspondence
- Effort needed to make your mind correspond to reality - this is not something that happens automatically
- Agree with conclusions of essay, but think that the argument could be improved
- Don’t agree with Nate’s use of the word “executive” - ascribes executive function to many things that we don’t have conscious control over
The Brain/Mind Distinction
- Largely a restatement of What Sort of Thing a Brain Is
- Consciousness is a part of the brain, not king of the brain
The Way of the Rationalist
- Can we actually think in terms of probabilities at a System 1 level - Kahneman doesn’t seem to think so
- Perhaps the best we can do is be aware of situations where our intutions towards certainty aren’t good approximations and prime ourselves to use System 2 in those situations
- Assigning probabilities of 0 and 1 may not be mathematically accurate, but is a useful mental shortcut for computing approximations